The Most Optimal Letter
GCC has an interesting take on optimizing a localization table:
7816>?
WenWraW W WroWocWl WntWraWtiWn
W--W--W--W--W--W--W--W--W--W--W--W--W--W--W--W--W--W--W--W--W--W--W--W--W--
W? WhiW hWlpW W0)WLiWt WurWenW mWcrWs
WX/WX WonWerWs W/rWveWseWX W(xW MWcrW x
W~ WelWteWt W [WStWrt
W# WesWt WheWBPW W W SWop
W$ WumW tW bWotWoaWerW {WStWrtWwiWh WeaW
&W% WelWy W uW/mW W} WtoW
aWA/W AWXPWN WloW/HW/RWADW WabW" WenW sWriWg
W SWt WauWraWe W 1W3
W/CWAUW aWsiWnmWntW(aWx/WS)W 0W12W
dWD WeaWurW AWC WonWe/WONW.)W0bW10WSeWd WalWe
W MWasWreWfrWquWncW W RWad
Wg/W GWneWatW PWM/WerWo W/ WLKWhi
Wh WomWanWhiWtoWy W \WCLW lW
iWVeWsiWniWfoWstWtuWinWo W^ WLKWtiWk
W/LWBiWorWerW(mWb/WSBW W DWT Wi
W CWanWe WodW W_ WATWlo
Wo WetWouWpuW tWpeW W DWT WeaW
pWP WulWupWreWisWorW (WffWONW !WBiW rWad
Ws WcrWptWenWinW W: WepWatWe.W. W:1W
vWShWw WolWs/WtaWesW ;WBiWs Wo WeaW/wWitW eWg.W0xW5;W
wWW WSUW(oWf/WN)W /Wx=W>/W0>WUsWrmWcrW xWasWigW xWliWt Wll
That only happens at -O1 or higher; with optimization off it comes out fine.